<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evil Science &#187; Safari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evilscience.org/tag/safari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evilscience.org</link>
	<description>Internet, technology, seo, design and general IT things...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iPhone 3G</title>
		<link>http://www.evilscience.org/iphone-3g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.evilscience.org/iphone-3g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hellas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart phone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evilscience.org/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not so much interested for mobile phones but while searching for smart phones this one blow me away. iPhone 3G!
3G iPhone is smart mobile phone by Apple (is there anyone who did not heard for them). It has that fancy design, so as all Apple products but iPhone 3G have great options and [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not so much interested for mobile phones but while searching for smart <a title="phones" href="http://www.mobiles.co.uk/" target="_blank">phones</a> this one blow me away. iPhone 3G!<br />
<a title="3G iPhone" href="http://www.mobiles.co.uk/iphone-3g.html" target="_blank">3G iPhone</a> is smart mobile phone by Apple (is there anyone who did not heard for them). It has that fancy design, so as all Apple products but iPhone 3G have great options and hardware under the skin. It is the advanced version of common iPhone. This phone is coming without keyboard. Actually it have keyboard – virtual keyboard on its screen, sensitive to touch. 2mpx camera is also here. Most interesting function for me is full 802 b/g wifi adapter for internet connection and UMTS or HSDPA 3G standard. His 400 MHz processor is probably strong enough for coffee surf. Also I am wondering how Opera Mini (even if Apple is against this – they prefer that you use Safari) would work on this thing.<span id="more-250"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/636px-iphone_edge_and_3g.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-254  aligncenter" title="636px-iphone_edge_and_3g" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/636px-iphone_edge_and_3g-400x376.jpg" alt="636px iphone edge and 3g 400x376 iPhone 3G" width="400" height="376" /></a></p>
<p>Interesting option also is assisted gps and 3.5 inch TRRS connector for the headphones, so finally I can get rid of my old mp3 player. With its interface, 1400 mAh  battery and lets say 8 GB memory card, iPhone will perform better then probably most cheaper mp3 players today. Interface is also respectable: 480×320 px, 3.5 in (89 mm), 3:2 aspect ratio, 262,144-color LCD.</p>
<p>Price: 500$<br />
Conclusion: When it gets little bit cheaper, I will throw my old SE K750 into the garbage <img src='http://www.evilscience.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' title="iPhone 3G image" /> .</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.evilscience.org/iphone-3g/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari</title>
		<link>http://www.evilscience.org/internet-explorer-vs-firefox-vs-opera-vs-chrome-vs-safari/</link>
		<comments>http://www.evilscience.org/internet-explorer-vs-firefox-vs-opera-vs-chrome-vs-safari/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hellas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faceoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evilscience.org/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Browser wars &#8211; Browsers FACEOFF &#8211; 2008/2009 &#8211; comparison test

I searched all over the net for latest browser speed comparison test and I did not find anything,  so I decided why not to make test myself.  I already had on my pc, Opera and Firefox so I downloaded latest version of IE7, Chrome and Safari. [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">Browser wars &#8211; Browsers FACEOFF &#8211; 2008/2009 &#8211; comparison test</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-197  aligncenter" title="naslovna" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/naslovna.jpg" alt="naslovna Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="406" height="109" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I searched all over the net for latest browser speed comparison test and I did not find anything,  so I decided why not to make test myself.  I already had on my pc, Opera and Firefox so I downloaded latest version of IE7, Chrome and Safari. Since I am big Opera fan and I am using Opera Browser for  over 9 years I thought that Opera will easily blow up opponents just like it did maybe two years ago. However I did not count that Chrome is so blazing fast.  I used few old tests from HowToCreate.co.uk and Java Script tests from CelticKane.com and also I added few of my own&#8230; All browsers are tested on same machine Athlon 3800 64bit, Gigabyte M55S-S3 mainboard and 2 gb DDR2 ram and <strong>Windows XP with SP2</strong>.</p>
<p>Browsers:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Opera Browser" href="http://www.opera.com" target="_blank">Opera 9.63</a><br />
<a title="Firefox" href="http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/" target="_blank">Firefox 3.0.4</a><br />
<a title="IE 7" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/ie/default.mspx" target="_blank">Internet Explorer 7.0.5730.13</a><br />
<a title="Google Chrome" href="http://www.google.com/chrome" target="_blank">Google Chrome 1.0.154.36</a><br />
<a title="Safari Browser" href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" target="_blank">Apple Safari 3.2.1</a></p>
<p><strong>All browsers are tested &#8220;out of the box&#8221; without any extension or plugin.</strong><br />
This gave significant advantage to Firefox, since it is considerable slower with just couple of extensions.<span id="more-196"></span></p>
<p><strong>1. Cold Start:</strong><br />
For cold start test, I run the programs (after windows finish loading) and then I measure time of loading until browser is ready for use. I measure 3 times and between any test I reset my pc. For other tests I also measured 3 times and then calculated average value&#8230;  After first test, Chrome already jumped on the first place with unbolivable load of only 1,6 seconds. Opera was second with 3,7 second and surprise was Internet Explorer with just 0,1 second behind Opera. Safari started bad with very slow loading with over 10 seconds.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-198" title="coldstart" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/coldstart.png" alt="coldstart Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>2. Warm Start</strong><br />
Warm start is the test when I run browser then turn it off and then start it again without turning or logging out from windows. I hardly got Chrome loading time in this case, since it was incredible fast.  Safari, for a difference from last test, was now very fast to. Opera and Firefox are slower then first three.<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-199" title="warmstart" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/warmstart.png" alt="warmstart Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>3. <a title="Acid 2" href="http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/" target="_blank">Acid 2 test</a></strong><br />
Acid 2 is web standard compliance test. All browsers easily passed, but IE7 failed  completely  with ruining and deforming that poor face.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-200" title="acid2" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/acid2.png" alt="acid2 Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>4. <a title="Acid 3" href="http://acid3.acidtests.org/" target="_blank">Acid 3 test</a></strong><br />
After easy job on ACID 2, neither one browser passed Acid 3 test. However Opera scored most points, ending it with the score of 85. Chrome was second with the score of 79. Some alpha and beta version of browser are already passing successfully  this test&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-201" title="acid3" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/acid3.png" alt="acid3 Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>5. CSS speed test</strong><br />
This test was taken from HowToCreate.co.uk!<br />
Quote:<br />
To test CSS rendering speed I use a CSS benchmark test devised by nontroppo. The test measures the time it takes the browser to render a page consisting of almost 2500 positioned DIVs. The page is stored locally, loaded once to pre-load it, then reloaded 3 times, and the average time taken  for those three renderings. The page is the first page loaded after starting the browser (after logging out and in). All browsers took significantly  longer during the initial load, which is why I discount this initial load, as it does not reflect the reality of normal rendering. Safari and Firefox headed clear victory here leaving behind Opera then Chrome and IE7.<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-202" title="cssspeed" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/cssspeed.png" alt="cssspeed Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>6. Javascript speed</strong><br />
I assigned  browsers to <a title="Celtic Kane" href="www.celtickane.com" target="_self">celtickane.com</a> javascript speed test. Every browser is tested three times and then average speed is calculated. Chrome won  again with Safari on second, Opera on third, Firefox on 4th and as expected IE7 on the last place.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-203" title="javascript" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/javascript.png" alt="javascript Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>7. Memory usage</strong><br />
I started every browser with one tab. Opened google.com and then checked with Chrome &#8220;memory usage option&#8221; how much every browser take memory.  IE7 taked easy victory here probably because parts of the IE are in some other windows processes which are not counted. Safari taked shameful last place with using over 65 MB for loading only one page.<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-204" title="memory" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/memory.png" alt="memory Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>8. Setup Size</strong><br />
Opera used to have smallest installation file but now Firefox takes that place. Interesting thing is that if you dont need additional languages then Opera setup.exe is smaller then 6 mb, however since Opera gives this file for download by default then I took that file in count.<br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-205" title="sizes" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/sizes.png" alt="sizes Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /><br />
<strong>9. Options</strong><br />
Firefox got second win. By using extension firefox becomes very powerful tool. Main reason why people use it. Opera widgets are silly thing in  relation to extensions and UserJS are ok but not good as Firefox Extensions. However this bring another conclusion, Firefox without extension is  nothing. If you integrate to many extension then Firefox performance decrease significantly, almost 4-6 times&#8230; As I already mentioned this tests are conducted on Firefox without single extension. Just Out of the box. Even with that problem, Firefox easily take  win here leaving Opera behind. This category gives also to Chrome first last place since Chrome in current stage looks like a hairless person <img src='http://www.evilscience.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' title="Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari image" /><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-206" title="options" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/options.png" alt="options Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /></p>
<p><strong>Conclusion and FINAL SCORE.</strong><br />
Opera do not have advantage any more. Instead of advantage it is neither anymore the fastest. Chrome is ahead, then Opera on second place  and Firefox just behind it (depends on personal taste). Safari is ok browser but weaker then first three, and it looks that Apple marketing is just a bunch of lies.  IE7 is the bad thing. Just like a IE6. But since people get it free with windows they still use it. If we counted Opera powers of customizing skins, moving elements  (such as menus, buttons,  toolbars, adressbar, statusbar, skins) then Opera would  be easily be on first place&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-207" title="final" src="http://www.evilscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/final.png" alt="final Internet Explorer vs Firefox vs Opera vs Chrome vs Safari" width="334" height="113" /></p>
<p>For myself, I am going to stick with the Opera. Chrome, even if it is fastest, dont have some  key capabilities. Probably people who use Firefox think the same as Opera fans&#8230;<br />
If you found this article useful please share it on some social bookmark network bellow.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.evilscience.org/internet-explorer-vs-firefox-vs-opera-vs-chrome-vs-safari/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
